Use the following affiliate links to support me without any additional costs for you ▻Buy Control on MMOGA ▻Support me on Patreon if you …
00:03 4K QUALITY DLSS 2.0 2560×1440 Vs DLSS 1.9 2560×1440 FPS TEST02:04 4K PERFORMANCE DLSS 2.0 1920×1080 Vs DLSS 1.9 1920×1080 FPS TEST03:38 4K QUALITY DLSS 2.0 2560×1440 Vs DLSS 1.9 1920×1080 Graphics Comparison05:02 4K PERFORMANCE DLSS 2.0 1920×1080 Vs DLSS 1.9 1920×1080 Graphics ComparisonHaven't the balanced preset in this video, it stays around 53-55 fps average, no big visual difference to performance, performance wins overall in my opnion you can clearly play at 4K 60FPS.
Ray tracing at high is overkill. I recommend using medium preset for RT
Gimmick AF. Render it at a lower resolution and use a sharpen reshade or something better, with a monitor that has a feature of vivid pixels, the result is the same as the DLSS 2.0 BS. We need a better brutal raw power GPU, not something like this shite to compromise a supposed-better product.
Can you guys explain, I have a hard time understanding this tech. So, I have a 1440p monitor. Does this mean I have to set my main res to native 1440p and for example – the rendering res to 1080p in order to get more fps (like I'm playing in 1080p) but with the look of my native 1440p?
I testing DLSS 2.0 its look sharper,cleaner than DLSS previously. DLSS 960P. I am on 2080 Super and 9700K.
It looks better with much less motion artifacts. But I still think DLSS in Youngblood and other DLSS 2.0 supported games looks way better. Tbh this game is a blurry mess with artifacts even at native resolution. DLSS helps get rid of the blur with much better performance so it's a win. Remedy just needs a better engine than this.
I'm not getting those presets options like in Wolfenstein (Quality, Performance, etc) so i'm not sure if i got the updated version, what i can tell you is that i'm able to choose 1080p for render resolution and set resolution to 4k, does that mean that i'm using dlss 2.0?
Good comparison!But wasn't 2.0 marked to improve performance instead of worsening it?It was claimed, that you can get 4K from 1080p instead of 1440p … please help me out
why do you only get 48 fps at 1440p? I get like 80-100 fps at MAX DLSS 2.0 with ray tracing
Did you use quality setting? On perfomance and balanced is there any quality loss?
bro pls make how to lock the base clock of cpu Ryzen 5 3500u
only works with new driver or works with 445.50 ?
nice work dls 2 better than native
But we have 10 fps less in 2.0
2.0 looks way cleaner. Some textures really looks better .
Oh no it's a Control video, here we go again…
Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *
Enregistrer mon nom, mon e-mail et mon site web dans le navigateur pour mon prochain commentaire.