Red Dead Redemption 2 on PC benchmarked for CPU performance, including new and old Intel and AMD Ryzen CPUs. We also talk BIOS issues and stuttering …
Watch our RDR2 GPU benchmark here! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yD3xd1qGcfo – we have a graphics explanation guide coming up for the game next!To further elaborate on the 9700K: It's not a "framerate cap" here, but an engine FPS threshold where performance tanks if insufficient threads are present, but performance is still high. Both a thread deficit and high framerate are needed to encounter this, hence the uniqueness of the bug. Because high perf & medium thread count is an uncommon combination (the 9700K is among the only ones), the bug is more interesting than most. There's a limitation of threads that affects it. That's why the 8T older CPUs are fine, but the 9700K isn't — those aren't fast enough to hit the engine threshold. This is a two-part issue. GTA V had that issue w/ 6T CPUs, but not 12T CPUs (8700K). Support our all-nighter efforts like this one via the GN store, where we're planting 10 trees per item ordered through Nov: https://store.gamersnexus.net/ or Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/gamersnexus
Pagefile determine the amount of data RAM can carry, initial should be your actual ram you have and max is the amount it can store for later use. Best way to do this if you have money is to have a separate SSD hard drive dedicated to only pagefilem, the bigger the better.
The frame rate issue is due to not enough pagedile as pc constantly uncompressed file to stream to gpu
I have i7 2600 but I want ryzen 5 3600x
Check at those amd Ryzen 7 and 9 results. They are the best performing when it comes to the low % frame rates. I see this on a lot of titles when comparing with Intel. Hence why I went Ryzen.
the game runs great on my ryzen 5 1600 paired with an rog x370, but runs like doodoo on my MSI laptop with an 8750h
And here I am rocking a 2500k with RX 580 8gb on balanced settings averaging 55 FPS
The xfx GeForce 7300 GS was the first graphics card I had ever owned and it had the exact same box design, I even still have it; it is too cool looking to throw away!
Im playing this game in 4k with a i5 4670k and rtx 2070 on optimised settings (hardware unboxed) at 42 fps average. If I play at 5/6 resolution (1800p) I get around 53 fps average.
i7 7700k was worst purchase/upgrade 2017 – gamers nexus. Well you didn't see this game coming
Ok I have a question, why have you Overclocked the i9 9900k but not the Ryzen 9 3900X? not accusing or anything just genuinely curious.
I dunno what are you talking about? I play red dead II flawlessly
I'm playing this on a 2010 Mac Pro with an old Xeon, but it runs great at high/ultra settings with the GTX980 I have in 1080p.
Hmmm, It runs fine on my Gigabyte Aorus Z390 Master with a i9-9900KS and 128GB of Corsair Vengeance LPX RAM…..it must be a AMD Ryzen issue…..waaa waaa waaa……
Still after updates with 9400f icannot get consistent 60 fps dips to 40 is very annoying in citys
Other than day 1 trying to launch the game I have had zero issues with RDR2 . Asus Strix Z-370-GI7 9700k @TurboMsi RTX 2080 TrioHyperX Fury [email protected]Thermaltake 750w toughpowerOnly issue I had day one was the game not launching due too HDR. I turned on HDR in windows 10, Boom, I got too the game menu, turned off HDR in RDR2 settings. Exit, turn off HDR in w10. Good too go. Zero issues with nearly 100hrs of game time. Was likely a driver issue, and not mobo specific. Good Day
That Ryzen 5 1600. #RESPECT
I'm using i7-6850k and 1080ti on win8.1 (using vulkan). I maxed all settings at 1440p and I'm getting 27-35fps. Story mode is playable tbh. No freezes, it just feels like 27fps. If I use the optimised settings from Hardware Unboxed I get 52-85fps (avg 70ish) and it feels pretty smooth. My cpu sits at 52C with a H100i, and the gpu fan is quite loud. I'm also running a minecraft server in the background, people occasionally connect to it while I'm playing rdr2 lol. No idea what their experience is like, no complaints so far.
I have a intel 9960x with a 2080ti all ultra.
Currently running a 6700k witha vega 64 with no issues on High settings overall.. certainly odd and confusing across the range. Great content 🙂 Cheers
Seems like my 8700k is still pretty solid.
My i7 4790k great works
How the hell i'm running this at 40 FPS1080p all maxed, only water is 3/4 and no taa.Palit GTX 1080 Amp extreme 8gb vrami5 4690k8gb ddr3 ram.Needed to do some tweaks for stability issues.GPU clock -20 HzGPU mem clock -40 Hz GPU fans 100 %Use CPU lasso to limit 1 thread for 2% for 1 s.Clear settings folder in c, users, app data etc. (Leave only system.ini cuz this remembers your settings) When usage spike to 100 %
If i dont do this game crash after 60 s.I have around 40 FPS.I can reach 60 FPS with medium high settings, but game is 2 damn georgeus and stilo smoother than PS4 pro version ive played B4.
It basically looks like if you have a non-hyperthreaded cpu, you'll have bad 1% lows at 1080p
You have to be sick in the head to lower the settings. It is not realistic! And than kids will say that this CPU is better for this game… Bulshit. Settings should be as high as possible or testing with different settings
No point benchmarking broken software.. except for views I guess…
So what motherboard would I need to run this with a i7-9700k
amd 2600x ??
Ya… but it is only on the intel cpu… so is it game engine issue… or something up with the way the cpu is working which isn't jiving right? The port was based on a console game… with AMD cpu… so… you do the math.
there are a minium system req (low fps)medium (201xx cpu gpu)and high ultra. 2017-2019 cpu gpu and a lot of ram.choose youre path in MONEY. startup errors from rockstar. or just wait for codex patch and play it offline (no piracy doh) just play it witouth rockstar annoying just a few more gigabyte patches before you START up/ begin s. it is so big as it had to have a new fast pcie 4.0 nve ssd drive to install from on and a 300mb-10gb (altibox) to run good. https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/22091371 good enough ? https://www.techspot.com/review/1939-red-dead-redemption-2-benchmarks/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0uB17Io2is https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/21686897 better ?? https://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyri/requirements/red-dead-redemption-2/16908 so removing some files to bd r xl 100gb 128 (300gb) it would be downloaded FAST. since x570-p has 2.5gb in speed. now at 500 mb later ill go for 1gb 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 .but 10 gb are to exspensive for me EVER. 149 000 nok.
My laptop has a i7 7700hq,, an gtx 1050 I can run this game,, ? Thanks u
I have a MSI MS-7797 motherboeard with a I7 3770 processor, 16 GB DDR3 Ram and a Geforce 1050 TI from Gigabite on windows 10, and it worked the first time for me after download.I even have pretty good graphics.
All the cpus that didn't have hyperthreading have horrible 0.1 and 1% lows
not to mention the unlimited disconnections online. blue screen and freezes on ps4
I7 8700k stock, 80 degress in rdr2, not always. Its ok?
no i7 4470k? 🙁
This comparison isnt really valid any more since the updates and driver hotfix.I'm running an i5 6600k and a gtx 1080. Getting a great experience of avg. 60 fps at 1440p mixed settings medium to ultra.
what ram ghz u use for ryzen?
Thank you. Gamer Nexus
Rockstar should be ashamed they had at least 1 year for the pc version, and yet they released a buggy game.
why are the lows so bad on all non hyper threaded ones? doesn't make any sense. the 2600K 4c/8t has much better lows than the 8c/8t 9700k. thats insane if u think about it. is there something i miss here?
Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *
Enregistrer mon nom, mon e-mail et mon site web dans le navigateur pour mon prochain commentaire.