RX 5700 XT + Ryzen 5 3600 vs. i9 10900K + RTX 3080 Ti

ASUS ROG Strix AMD Radeon RX 5700XT MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti VENTUS AMD RYZEN 5 3600 (4.3 GHz OC) Intel Core i9-10900K 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 …

(Visited 6 times, 1 visits today)

You might be interested in

Comment (48)

  1. I clicked on the video to see just how badly the Intel / NoVideo setup beats my setup which is the same as the left, but god fucking damn I expected a lot more from the Intel / NoVideo system???!

  2. Moreover, if he were to ramp up every game to its max settings, the 9900k combo would perform even better. So to summarise, the 3600 combo is obviously a better price to performance deal, but at higher end gaming, there really is no comparison between these 2 set-ups.

  3. Why not OC the 9900k like most users would like you did for the Ryzen? The point of paying more money for these products is not only the base performance but the ability to push them beyond their stock stats

  4. I can see Nvidia cannot support well even his own optimized games many times and all this with overpriced products…. Nice work Nvidia and Nvitios who buying this products 😂😂😂😂

  5. Idk what's the point of fooling the viewers with unfair comparisons. Stock i9 9900K (4.7GHz while it could do at least 5.0GHz and even more with OC) against overclocked Ryzen 3600. RX 5700XT also has some aggressive boost clocks. You can OC 2080TI a little cause it has a temp lead. With these changes the difference will be more noticeable. I know you guys wanna believe it's true, we all love AMD's new products but we should judge objectively. This is trash of a comparison, I recommend you guys to try something else.

  6. Shadow of the Tomb Raider – 40% faster
    World War Z – 40% faster
    The Witcher 3 – 40% faster
    Battlefield V – 30% faster
    Far Cry New Dawn – 30% faster
    Assassin's Creed Odyssey – 30% faster
    Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order – 60% faster
    Need For Speed Heat – 30% faster
    Metro Exodus – 100% faster………

    Average is 44% for 200% more price.

  7. I think the i9 is poor choice in terms of solely gaming but a 2080ti is deff future proof for 4k capability than the 5700xt. Given that I'm sure that's what nvidia is trying to push with the 2080 ti

  8. 6:15 the Intel system's CPU usage goes up to 80% of usage, to be honest something is fishy, this is why I can't trust these unreliable sources like this channel. You can't see 80% of usage with an i9 9900k even in 1080p or 1440p. I accept that the Ryzen 5 3600 is a good CPU, but not better than an i9 9900k and I says that as a Ryzen user (Ryzen 9 3900x). And the CPU usage is CONSTANTLY better than the i9 9900k's. How can I tell this is a true comparison? That the test is really in 4k and not just upscaled and that the reviewer using really these cards and really these CPUs? Yes, nobody. I hate these faceless fake channels. If you want real reviews. Watch Hardware Unboxed, Gamer Nexus or Bitwit or JayzTwoCents, Tech Yes City these REAL people show their faces, their test bench, their review products. They are reliable!!!!

  9. I was expecting so much more from AMDs offering considering all the tech hype on youtube from gamermeld, etc about being so much 'better'. I'm just not seeing it here ! Think I'll stick with my Intel / Nvidia builds for now. OK It's more expensive but at the end of the day you get what you pay for.


Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *