Support us on Patreon: AMD Ryzen 5 3600: AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: …
So I got a bit carried away with the test configurations on this one, I'll refine it for followup content, this was just something a bit different. Anyway I hope you still enjoyed the results.
ryzen 5 3600+rtx 2060 super+Samsung C24FG !!! 💖
2080 super will perform close to 2080 Ti results or nah?
I cant believe the difference between r5 3600 and i9 9900k is so small, why would anyone would waste so much money when you can just get a better gpu with the price difference
Please do it this test again with include RX 5600XT! I am very wonder of Ryzen 5 3600 + RX 5600XT performance.
I'm looking forward to this update with Ryzen 4000.
Ryzen 3600 it is.
Conclusion: If your CPU budget >$300 then go Intel and spend at least $400 for the GPU to get your money's worth. Else, you're obviously on a budget, so go AMD on the CPU and spend no more than around $400 on the GPU. This is sound Vulcan logic.
I using flight simulators and I'm thinking of trading my Ryzen 5 3600 for an I9 9900K or KS.
Im not even at the 2 min mark of the video lenght yet, but after hearing everything youve done, I already give it a like considering all the effort it was put on it!!! Great work!!!!!
Good test, but please test 4K as well at High(ultra) and Medium settings.Last weekend I do trial run: Witcher 3 at Rt 2700X and R9 290 in 4K and… is possible (high settings, with hairworks off).Sure – game not hold 60FPS but Freesync do it's job and looks pretty good (if ignore FPS meter)
Atm I have a r5 3600 and a gtx 1660 ti. Both overclocked. The r5 is at 4.25Ghz and the 1660 ti now has 2060 performance. I couldn’t be more happy
I wouldn't bother using a 2080 card, nobody really spends that much money unless mummy or daddy pays for it.
It seems unnecessary to buy a 2080 ti when you can buy a 2070 super with a 3600 and have almost equivalent performance. This is exactly what I did for my new system.
I don't understand why you'd go from 1440p ultra to 1080p ultra instead of 1440p ultra to 1440p high. Either someone is gaming on 1440p or 1080p. The other party doesn't really care what they do in terms of performance. Kinda confusing :S
2:10 holy fucking christ
3600 and 5700XT is a lot better than the 3600X and 5700 unless the 5700 is on sale for $300 (it is rn)
Damn Ryzen 5 3600 is a KING . I wonder for how long it will hold up with newer games.
I always consider that selecting a GPU first is the right step to move while building a PC, this would allow us to pair it with the CPU that is capable of utilizing it completely without any bottleneck or overkilling
I found a ryzen 5 3500 for 130$ and i couldn't resist , it performs identical to the 3600 in games but the margin will grow in the future
But still 3600 was 50% more expensive than 3500 for like maybe +/- 5 or 10% performance in few games . 3600 would be for those who want productivity and future proofing
Most current games give slightly better fps with smt disabled in 3600 anyway
Upgraded from my 2200g to the 3600. Damn. The difference in frame rate and frame consistency is completely insane. Never realized how cripples my system was without it!
Consider only doing the quality settings benchmarks in one or two of the tested games in the future.
The scaling is interesting.
where is bfV ?
Dude the r5 3600 for the price is what I would get for only gaming just amazing seeing this its plenty
No second gen Ryzen… Means that difference is too small in between 2nd and 3rd gen Ryzen.
And to think I was about to invest an extra 500 into the ryzen 9 when the 5 is just as good for games lol
Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *
Enregistrer mon nom, mon e-mail et mon site web dans le navigateur pour mon prochain commentaire.